<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is SexDay&#8217;s Poster Too Sexy for its Clothes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crystal1</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>crystal1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Thanks everyone. Sorry for the delay in posting your comments. I just found them today, waiting to be approved in our pending box all these months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone. Sorry for the delay in posting your comments. I just found them today, waiting to be approved in our pending box all these months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen G. Barr</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen G. Barr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 01:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I think it (and the body) rock!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it (and the body) rock!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mich</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Well, I think it just matches. The clothes are sexy so everything must be sexy. They should add some &lt;a href=&quot;http://mysexystories.com/blog/2010/04/08/dress-to-thrill&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; bellystrings&lt;/a&gt; so it will be more hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think it just matches. The clothes are sexy so everything must be sexy. They should add some <a href="http://mysexystories.com/blog/2010/04/08/dress-to-thrill" rel="nofollow"> bellystrings</a> so it will be more hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-15</guid>
		<description>The point is, we are now talking about sex by talking about the poster with the cutie on it, what we think is the sexual ideal, about what sex is and what it&#039;s &quot;supposed to be.&quot; The poster provoked the discussion, so it did its job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is, we are now talking about sex by talking about the poster with the cutie on it, what we think is the sexual ideal, about what sex is and what it&#8217;s &#8220;supposed to be.&#8221; The poster provoked the discussion, so it did its job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-11</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#comment-10&quot;&gt;I love the poster. is it Sexist and youth based?… perhaps… effective? yes!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Okay, &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-10&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;frankie&lt;/a&gt; but…effective &lt;em&gt;at what&lt;/em&gt;? If it is &quot;perhaps&quot; sexist, then I&#039;d question value of the effect.

I&#039;m not thrilled with the poster, but not because it&#039;s sexist (you can call anything sexist if you try hard enough) but rather because I&#039;m unsure if it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;congruent with the rest of SexDayUSA&#039;s message&lt;/em&gt; as I understand it. I could be misunderstanding, but it is &lt;em&gt;so easy&lt;/em&gt; to inappropriately eroticize sexuality—a concept distinct from &lt;em&gt;sex&lt;/em&gt;—that I think this poster swings too far in the direction of playing on overarching themes of &lt;em&gt;sexualization&lt;/em&gt; as opposed to &lt;em&gt;conceptualization&lt;/em&gt;.

I hope that makes sense to others and not just to me. :)

Either way, huge kudos for getting a conversation going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#comment-10"><p>I love the poster. is it Sexist and youth based?… perhaps… effective? yes!</p></blockquote>
<p>Okay, <a href="#comment-10" rel="nofollow">frankie</a> but…effective <em>at what</em>? If it is &#8220;perhaps&#8221; sexist, then I&#8217;d question value of the effect.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not thrilled with the poster, but not because it&#8217;s sexist (you can call anything sexist if you try hard enough) but rather because I&#8217;m unsure if it&#8217;s <em>congruent with the rest of SexDayUSA&#8217;s message</em> as I understand it. I could be misunderstanding, but it is <em>so easy</em> to inappropriately eroticize sexuality—a concept distinct from <em>sex</em>—that I think this poster swings too far in the direction of playing on overarching themes of <em>sexualization</em> as opposed to <em>conceptualization</em>.</p>
<p>I hope that makes sense to others and not just to me. <img src='http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Either way, huge kudos for getting a conversation going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal1</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Pascale. you open up a very current discussion about body shape and sexualization. The site linked to your own profile displays a idealized looking couple in perfected embrace. So let&#039;s question both these images and the personalized judgements that all of us as individuals bring to any image. Had either you or sexdayusa shown bodies that were very different, or if not bodies some other symbol, what would the reactions be? That we were not being sexual enough, or that we&#039;re playing to current political correctness? For instance, what if our model for the 2010 poster has a naturally protruding rib cage-- an anomoly, perhaps? Should we ban her image because it&#039;s not the average shape? Or let&#039;s assume that she is sucking it up? Then, isn&#039;t that sex in America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pascale. you open up a very current discussion about body shape and sexualization. The site linked to your own profile displays a idealized looking couple in perfected embrace. So let&#8217;s question both these images and the personalized judgements that all of us as individuals bring to any image. Had either you or sexdayusa shown bodies that were very different, or if not bodies some other symbol, what would the reactions be? That we were not being sexual enough, or that we&#8217;re playing to current political correctness? For instance, what if our model for the 2010 poster has a naturally protruding rib cage&#8211; an anomoly, perhaps? Should we ban her image because it&#8217;s not the average shape? Or let&#8217;s assume that she is sucking it up? Then, isn&#8217;t that sex in America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-4</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s perfect. It evokes her love of sex--and mine. 
Yikes. The day is almost over. What am I doing reading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s perfect. It evokes her love of sex&#8211;and mine.<br />
Yikes. The day is almost over. What am I doing reading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascale</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be honest. The woman (I&#039;m presuming it&#039;s a woman)has a sunken in stomach and with the rib cage showing, It appears she is sucking her stomach in. Why is she doing that? To hide any &#039;fat&#039; or &#039;bulge&#039;? Is that&#039;s the opposite of what sex day is about - celebrating our bodies. *confused*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest. The woman (I&#8217;m presuming it&#8217;s a woman)has a sunken in stomach and with the rib cage showing, It appears she is sucking her stomach in. Why is she doing that? To hide any &#8216;fat&#8217; or &#8216;bulge&#8217;? Is that&#8217;s the opposite of what sex day is about &#8211; celebrating our bodies. *confused*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankie</title>
		<link>http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/2010/03/02/is-sexdays-poster-too-sexy-for-its-clothes/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sexdayusa.com/comstockeryblog/?p=106#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I love the poster. is it Sexist and youth based?... perhaps... effective? yes!

as for next years poster, maybe a contest with signed prints available for purchase?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the poster. is it Sexist and youth based?&#8230; perhaps&#8230; effective? yes!</p>
<p>as for next years poster, maybe a contest with signed prints available for purchase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

